This video shows the testing of a pressure pad and how simple it is to make it. This then was connected to the Arduino board to activate the on/off states and make the bin interactive.
Currently I am studying a Masters course at the University of Limerick. The course examines today's technology, how it is implemented and new ways of creating interaction. This blog space will be used to map my research and new findings daily and what thoughts that I may have on the development of my design projects.
Wednesday, 2 May 2012
Testing the Pressure Pads
This video shows the testing of a pressure pad and how simple it is to make it. This then was connected to the Arduino board to activate the on/off states and make the bin interactive.
Tuesday, 1 May 2012
Arduino development for prototype
This is a video showing the development of using Arduino combined with electronics for the interactive bin that our group was designing. Good fun : )
Monday, 30 April 2012
Presentation day
Civil Liberties and computer monitoring
Pretzi presentation http://prezi.com/ycut3sei7a-7/computer-monitoring-and-civil-liberties-1/
The presentation went well today and we had lots of fun putting everything together.I have photos of the T-Shirts and I must up-load them. Below is my final though
Pretzi presentation http://prezi.com/ycut3sei7a-7/computer-monitoring-and-civil-liberties-1/
The presentation went well today and we had lots of fun putting everything together.I have photos of the T-Shirts and I must up-load them. Below is my final though
For Aristotle and Socrates there is
nothing more important than the task of cultivating and practicing excellence
as a human being, meaning as a human being engaged with making ethical and
political judgments and choices. In particular, if we subordinate our
cultivation of excellence as ethical and political beings to any other activity
e.g. the pursuit of wealth or power – we thereby putt our capacity for reason
and ethical judgment at risk.
Socrates and Arastotle argue that
if we allow our interests in wealth and power to persuade us to judge and act
against our reason and better judgment, we therby harm these capacities (just
as we would harm a race horse, to use Socrates’ analogy, by using it as a
plow-horse instead.
They both believe that reaching
your maximum potential and being happy is still possible with moderate amount
of Power and wealth. But the contrast danger is to let out interests in wealth
and power overshadow our pursuit of excellence as ethical and political beings
– and thereby, to paraphrase Jesus for centries later, to gain the whole world
but to lose our souls.
Is it really worth it???
Saturday, 28 April 2012
Aristotle
Plato taught Aristotle and Socrates taught Plato
Both argued that no one knowingly
does evil, Socrates believed that if someone
knows what the right thing to do is, then they are going to do it….If they don’t do it, The evil person then is simply
ignorant or mistaken about what the right thing to do is.
………………........Me……………………….
Bad………………………………………Good
Good Plato said is a property that
all good things have n common. He also believed this was eternal, what was then
is the same for now, Then same for bad. Socrates believed that people
always naturally want to do the good, but because of ignorance aim at the bad.
Worst Cereal Killer, usually what they say is, what they were doing is
something what they would interpret of being Good. Helping the person, freeing
them, perhaps thinking that they were evil, perhaps they deserved to die,
Very rare that they say yes, it was a terrible action, but I did it
anyway. I.e. they generally aimed at the bad, but usually people tell
themselves a story and they are the good guys in the story,
They are simply ignorant about
the real truth about the matter is in this case, and they have mistakenly
identified something that is good which is not. simply got it backwards. They don’t
properly identify with the thing which is Good.
………………………………………………………………………………………
Aristotle denies that this is true. He believes that there are case
where people know what the right thing to do is, but simply don’t do it.
Persons wallet, with 100Euro,
persons name and address, but you choose to keep it… even a tax return, so you
know they don’t have a lot of money. You say, ah gee, I know I have to give it
back, but I don’t for what ever reason, you keep it for the new video game. I
know the right thing to do is, but, hey, I not going to do it….
If there are case like this, then
Socrates and Plato’s theory fail, they can’t be right…
The lesson for Aristotle is, from
these kinds of cases, person knows the right thing to do is, but fails to do
it, well the lesson for Aristotle is, being a good person is, not about knowing
something, but performing the right actions.
Friday, 27 April 2012
More on Aristotle
Virtue ethics
begins with the sensibility that we ought to do as human beings is, first of
all, to become excellent human beings. Becoming excellent human being, more
precisely, means to develop and fulfill our most important capacities as human
beings.
If our goal as
human beings is to achieve happiness, then it is equally important that we
develop what Aristotle (and, subsequently, Kant) identified as practical
reason.
Such practical reason involves
first of all our ability – given our best knowledge of reality and thus of our
possible choices and actions – to make the sorts of analyses and ethical
judgments required for us to do “The right thing” both for ourselves as
individuals (the ethical Aristotle) and for our larger communities (for
Aristotle, the political)
As we have seen, these sorts of
ethical decision-making further require what Socrates and Aristotle term
Phronesis, a practical judgment that is able to discern that right choice (or,
some-times, choices) among the possibilities before us.
And learning from mistakes means,
as Aristotle emphasized, that our developing these capacities of ethical
judgment and analyse, and of reason more broadly, is an on-going task: just as
the ethlet or physician must constantly practice if s/he is to maintain, much
less improve, his or her abilities, so we as human beings must likewise
cultivate in a conscious and on-going way our rational abilities, including our
use of Phronesis.
Week 14 Semester 2
This video is part of a series that I am posting as a blog about my weekly experience of doing a masters in Interactive Media and Design at the University of Limerick.
Thursday, 26 April 2012
What is Aristotle's perspective
To analyse the video that shows how the benefits of computering monitoring can help defeat crime these are the points that Aristotle would look at,
Aristotle virtue ethics is
interested in the question of how you become a good person.What would a good person be doing?Good actions.What’s a good action?Good actions are defined in terms
of what a good person would do.Knowing what makes a person good
and then seeing what kinds of actions the good or virtuous people perform.What are virtues? Virtues are
character traits, like honesty, generosity, chastely, bravery, courage etc.A person is good when they have
virtues.
……………………………………………………………………………………….
Nico ma che an Ethics asked about
the ‘Good’ which was the aim of every action and about what could constitute a
‘final good’ Aristotelian view is that the
highest good for man was eu daimonia, which latterly means having a good
spirit, but could be translated as happiness.He saw it as a state in which a
person was fulfilling his or her potential and natural function. It expressed a
form of human excellence of virtue.This tied in with his general view
that everything had a ‘final cause’: a goal and a purpose to which it moves. If
you understand the final cause of something, you understand its fundamental essence, which finds expression in that goal.If a knife had a soul, Aristotle
argued, that is what it is there to do. What then is the essence of human kind?
What is it there to do? What is it’s goal?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)